Stemmatics: reconstructing transmission trees from shared error
Philology's stemmatic method — kin to cladistics in biology — reconstructs a family tree of copies from the errors they share, on the logic that a mistake, once made, is inherited by all descendants. The lens generalizes the move beyond words: to the tooth-modules of geared machines, the compass-holes of maps, the small variants among duplicate stelae, even the order in which an author harvests quotations. Its signature deliverable is a genealogy or a channel-detection: which copies descend from which, and where a text switched exemplars mid-stream.
Synopsis
LLM-authored synopsis Not an articleA mistake, once copied, becomes a fingerprint: every later copy made from the flawed one inherits it, so tracing which manuscripts share which mistakes can reconstruct who copied from whom. This page gathers conjectures that borrow that logic -- called stemmatics, the philologist's family-tree method, and a close cousin of how biologists build an evolutionary tree from shared mutations -- and point it at things that are not manuscripts at all: the tooth-count on a gear, the seams in how a map was drawn, small variant details on duplicate inscriptions, even the order in which a writer quoted earlier sources.
Horoscope stemmatics and Peutinger's seams both hunt for a genealogical seam -- a point where a calculation or a map's construction visibly switched from one source to another partway through. Dice bias lineages applies the same shared-error logic to something not usually treated as a text at all: whether biased dice found in different places share a manufacturing lineage. The Organon travels as a block treats the surviving copies of Aristotle's logical works as travelling together as a single genealogical block rather than independently, the way a stemma -- a reconstructed family tree of copies -- would predict if they were always copied as a set.
Interpretive synthesis over gathered records only. It creates no article, evidence, inferon, source, or estimate.
Emergent lineage
Related pages, connected by this project's own research.
Related Pages
Other pages that share linked material with this one.
Record claim
About the production, transmission, survival, or filtering of the written/material record up to the pre-modern past itself -- scribal behaviour and e…
Manuscript and scribal production
Anonymous hands, production teams, witness families, codices, scribal layers, and manuscript-workshop lacunae.
Technical, recipe, and scientific texts
Recipe strata, agronomic source chains, astronomical catalogues, herbals, and practical technical corpora.
Channel dissociation
Two transmission channels for the same content predicted to carry opposite statistical signatures, including error-spectrum forensics (diagnosing the…
Astronomical tables
DISHAS, zij corpora, computus tables, horoscope recomputation, star catalogues, astrolabe/dial corpora.
Medieval Latin institutions and prosopography
Western and Latin institutional, office-holder, episcopal, monastic, parliamentary, and charter-implied gaps.
Epigraphy and damaged inscriptions
Damaged, copied, squeezed, fragmentary, or thinly contextualized inscriptional evidence routes.
Critical apparatus
genuine variant/apparatus data at scale -- Homeric papyri, Gandhari scrolls, epic recensions, Parry-Lord recordings. V2 narrows this family to true v…
Open conjectures — noetic, untested
Falsifiable questions posed below the evidence boundary by the 1001 Conjectures project. They are leads, not evidence, and carry no weight in this page's assessment.
- Horoscope stemmatics Anticipated in print · untested
- Peutinger's seams Falsified
- Dice bias lineages Anticipated in print · untested
- The pecia is a packet Anticipated in print · untested
- The Organon travels as a block Anticipated in print · untested
- Interlace slips map the work Anticipated in print · untested
From the One Thousand and One Conjectures. They carry no evidential weight here; verdicts and credits live on each conjecture's own page.